FS9/FSX. We know we have Blueprint fans in our reader base and as such, it would not be fair to them for us to leave this release out. CYUL V.2 was released by Blueprint last week and as there is another version available from another developer, I thought I would show a quick comparison to help you decide how to best spend your money on the quality options available.
Blueprint
FlyTampa
Blueprint
FlyTampa
We know the decision is though. Decide wisely!
______________________________________
Follow us on Twitter! / Like us on Facebook!
AirDailyX -We do things differently!
14 comments:
Not the greatest comparison shot is it? Ones too small.
as an owner of both, while BP's first version filled the gap nicely until something else came along, best bang for buck is FT's without a doubt...not saying the BP's version is bad..just that the other version is..well...superior.
Looooooool, give up or make it FREEWARE!
You are right! I corrected this.
DAndre should have to do a review :)
Dude, seriously... nothing wrong with inferior scenery. But why crete a dupe of whats already been done (at a very high level)? So many good airports left that need to be done in FSX. KBUR, KMKE, KSBA, KPDX... the list goes on. Yet these idiots chose to copy a masterpiece. Really? Wow!
Another piece of garbage released...
What? Really?? As much as I would love to, and believe me, it would be a funass read, i think I would piss off a lot of people! But you really made me excited just thinking about it.
You have to be an absolute and utter "die hard" Blueprint fan to chose over the Fly Tampa masterpiece.
I wouldn't download that garbage even if it was offered for free.
I don't understand the logic going on over there with the team at BluePrint Simulations. They did sceneries for Caracas, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Montreal, JFK- only after the likes of FSDreamTeam, FlyTampa, and LatinVFR already covered the airports, what is the point? Cover the airports that haven't been done!
Has blueprint become the punching bag for ADX? I'm not a fan at all, and would not buy their scenery, but I wouldn't buy any planes from abacus or the majority of the stuff from wilco, just to names a couple. Are we trying to run them out of town? There are a lot of shops that produce bear scat and charge way to much for it. Consumers vote with their wallets, and reviews/commentary on products help us make meaningful decisions; why turn up the heat so high on ol Blueprint? Why don't we give them a rest for a short spell, saddle up the horses and get a good down home posse going after Ariane Design and Peter Tishma. Now there is a villain that tried to ruin flightsim for all of us, and still rips off the unsuspecting with his bear scat!
This is a free market and no developer secures the rights to develop anything exclusively. We the customer can only benefit from the choice. Let your eyes and mind do the choosing, let your fingers type the payment details... that is how is decided which wins and which loses...
Although I do not intend to purchase their scenery, I see no reason for BP to be attacked all the time. For those who cannot afford to buy FT/FSDT and so on, it is an alternative and is certainly at least a little better than most default offerings...
AE
BP can sell what they want of course.
No way in hell I would buy it though.
Free market!
That means the consumer can say no too.
Post a Comment
Comments are now deactivated. Please visit our new website: AirDailyX.net
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.