Monday, November 5, 2012

Another beta flight on the "X"

 
FSX. Last test flights, last hours of checkings. And more screenshots of this long awaited Airbus.


 


http://forum.aerosoft.com/index.php?/topic/58780-airbus-x-extended-preview-part-3-new-images-updated-features/page__st__520#entry418046


 

10 comments:

CAT3Dual said...

I don't know what they are doing at Aerosoft but I can still see a number bugs...

FPA+Flight Director? lol
QNH missing (the PFD still shows STD)? lol

Ah, I forgot that it's WIP :D

I'll wait for the FSLabs...

Anonymous said...

Its user error Mate for the qnh (STD is blinking and and at that moment...)

Anonymous said...

Those VC textures look absolutely appalling as well, brings back memories of FS2002.

Anonymous said...

FPA: Flight Pitch Angle

Anonymous said...

Wow! I think the Airbus X Ext. VC textures look amazing. Maybe its a bad pic? The Airbus cockpit in general looks very bland IMO. Could it be that?

Anonymous said...

I know the Airbus cockpit is bland, I work with the real planes 5 days a week. And none of the A319/320s I work with are in pristine condition as Aerosoft simulates with their textures. Most airliners over a month or two old has signs of wear, dust, scratches, etc. Aerosoft hasn't bothered doing that on any screenshot I've seen so far. There textures also look flat and often, very fuzzy (very FS2002-like), they haven't bothered doing a proper AO bake so far (hence the flatness), and yes, I'm a developer as well so I know it's possible, it's just typical Aerosoft laziness and delivery of sub-par product. A lot can be done better at little extra effort, but the community is very accepting of bland products so why bother, right? Wrong! There is nothing wrong with calling a developer out when they are behind the 8-ball, especially when they want your BUSINESS. Freeware is one thing, but Aerosoft is a major payware developer, they can and should do better, much better, but they choose not to because they aren't that innovative, IMO.

CAT3Dual said...

It's the "Flight Path Angle" and it's shown by displaying "the bird" (Flight Path Vector FPV or Flight Path Director FPD) and not the flight director cross bars.

Furthermore the QNH display above the QNH selector is blank, that's not a user error.

Anonymous said...

it seems some people here have some sort of axe to grind....following and promoting particular developers..to the exclusion of others..... making outrageous statements such as comparisons with fs2002 ..and accusing bona fide organisations such as Aerosoft as being lazy ...come on...its disappointing...the flight sim community seems to have some of the most vindictive members around on the internet......having a genuine opinion is fine ...as long as you can back it up with arguments and facts..in other words dont make your opinions sound as if they facts.....rather than making statements that are defamatory statements... commentators should state how they would improve products ....without trying to promote what sometimes sounds like someone promoting some sort of hidden agenda

Anonymous said...

To those who do not like this..do want this...and think its crap....can you all just go away please and wait for your mythical FSlabs version, seriously your whining and moaning is pathetic and over-the-top

Anonymous said...

MY PANTALOONS ARE AFLAME!

Post a Comment

Comments are now deactivated. Please visit our new website: AirDailyX.net

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.