[Speculation] So besides us finally knowing when Montreal will be released (no we are not telling) what George and Martin are not talking about is that extra red dot where Toronto is located on the map. What we also didn't notice however, the dots are flashing which means both will be for FS9/FSX. But what most of us seemed to have missed is: the KSEA dot has turned from grey (denoting FS9) to red (denoting FSX). Hmmm... I really don't like these guys playing with my emotions like this!!
Have a look at the ad:
Keep an eye on us, the second we get the news, we will publish!
Join the convo here:
http://airdailyx.blogspot.com/2013/01/dear-god-look-at-this-point-in-space.html#more
AirDailyX -We do things differently!
21 comments:
KSEA has always been red, as grey denotes legacy, and, I guess, unreleased.
I wonder how frames would be if FlyTampa were to release a FSX version of KSEA. As of now, a lot of people are complaining about CYVR and ORBX PNW not getting along with the NGX. I just hope KSEA won't make it worse.
They aren't. It has always been like that, but, if we are talking in the hypothetical, I don't think KSEA would be too bad, and, even if it was, the sheer awesomeness of it, as well as the proximity to ORBXland and CYVR would be amazing.
I saw that as well.. but decided to overlook it (that being Ksea)Nice if true
Nothing for KMIA :D
YAH!
That's right Dmac, the grey means it's a legacy product. But isn't KSEA a legacy product anyway?
I don't remember where I read it , wasnt in a dream but aerosoft was planning Toronto maybe the Dubai collaboration applied to Toronto?
I Bet Toronto is the CYTZ island airport. It fits in with KBOS-KMDW and CYUL (Porter Airlines does all these routes from CYTZ).
It is also small enough to be added as a bonus to CYUL.
Although it seems that way, no. I was surprised as well. It was a newer FS9 product.
Sorry, if that last one didn't post - I was surprised as well, just a newer FS9 product. Sorry for a double post (if there is one)
Although a legacy product (aka no FSX), KSEA was always red in Flytampa's map, for reasons unknown.
A lot of people overlook LHR, who is making this?
LHR?! Are you serious?? LHR was done by UK2000 and Simwings (both of which are going to be updated this year with the new T2 included i expect).
So hang on a bleedin minute, are we talking about 3 sceneries from FT coming out??? Seattle Rebooted, Toronto and Montreal??!?!? I loved the FT Seattle scenery for FS9.
OryxSim is making a CYYZ, so maybe it will be released by FlyTampa. Just glad we are finally getting some good Canadian airports.
Personally, I don't think so...
Check out the quoted comment from George
Re: CYWG
by george[flytampa] » Sat Jan 05, 2013 12:32 pm
I'd love to develop Winnipeg but the bigger airports pay my rent, so I have to stick to those rather than what I'd like.
That quote was from this post...
http://www.flytampa.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=39927&sid=5cfbba5a751ff609644dba2a06a7af7d
If so Finally the western hemisphere scenery finally matches the release frequency of the Eastern hemisphere releases :)) More power to you FT...bring on the next and the next...OH; wait a minute, I'll have to get a third job:o
I bet George and Martin are sitting back and having a few laughs over this. Realistically, I think we are just getting Montreal out of all of this. Maybe YTZ or YYZ in a year or so. Martin just finished Dubai and George is about to complete YUL. When would they have had the time to do YYZ (a huge mega airport), SEA (a developers nightmare in terms of performance...just look at YVR), YUL, and Dubai. On top of that, OryxSim and maybe Aerosoft are doing YYZ. Why would any developer want to split the minimal revenue generated from FS add-on sales? It just does not make sense. Let's hope I'm wrong.
But if it is included with YUL....YTZ is really small.
No sh*t Flytampa is gonna release the quality of OryxSim, FT is much better!
Post a Comment
Comments are now deactivated. Please visit our new website: AirDailyX.net
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.