FS9 and FSX. Sad day but enchanted evening. That's how i will conclude this test. Blueprint Simulation doesn't change his habits. No photoreal textures except the usual low definition ground. Pale buildings but at night... [warning this is the Asia-Australia edition -uncompleted test]
Installation : very simple but still need manual record of the scenery in the library.
File : 44,9 mb (FSX)
Afcad file : include. extremely accurate.
Some transparencies in terminals.
Rather nice textures on terminal roofs.
Just simple neat Blueprint Sim Jetway. No florishes.
Nice architecture but where are the cars ?
A good example of what a designer can do without photoreal images...
But how much time does it takes to design it ?
Hangar at day : awful as usual, no relief and it still looks like old FS 2000...
At day, the low def. photoreal ground is awful compared
with the FS X defaut ground texture.
ENCHANTED NIGHT !
But at night, the low def. photoreal textures totally makes sense.
At dusk, no light on gates but nice colorful lights everywhere.
At night (here, 21:50 pm), the terminals are wonderful from the sky.
Even hangars look good !
That's it. I will only fly Blueprint Detroit Wayne County at night ! Na!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are now deactivated. Please visit our new website: AirDailyX.net
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.